Skip to main content

Expansion Review #3: Ticket to Ride: Europe

# of Players: 2-5
Playtime: 30-60 Minutes
Core Mechanic: Network Building/Set Collection
Theme: Trains
Type: Family Euro
Weight: Light-Med
Year: 2005

Rating: 8.0*

I really wasn't sure how to review Ticket to Ride: Europe (TtR: Europe) - as a new game, or standalone expansion, or combined with all the other expansions in a mini-review format? In the end, I decided to do this as an expansion review because the core game remains the same with a few tweaks and we will see if there is enough content to fill out a full expansion review or if I need to convert this to a mini-review. For starters, TtR: Europe is definitely a step-up in terms of complexity. But is that good or bad for this gateway level game?


For how to play the core game, please take a look at the original review for Ticket to Ride. TtR: Europe adds three new things - ferries, tunnels and train stations. Building a train station is a new action that can be taken in addition to the original three (drawing train cards, claiming routes, and drawing Destination Tickets). It can be done by playing a Train card of any color. A station can then be built in any city that does not have one yet. Subsequent stations cost one more Train card than number of Stations you have on the board already and you can at most have only three stations. Train stations can be used to connect to cities using another player's route using the city with the train station, provided you have at least one route connected to the city as well. This can provide some flexibility in obtaining your Destination Ticket goals since you won't be completely blocked if someone claims that last route you need.


There are two new route types added as well - ferries and tunnels. For ferry routes, in addition to the regular train cards required for claiming the route, an additional locomotive is needed. For tunnel routes, after showing the required train cards for claiming the route, another three cards are drawn from the train card draw pile. Each train card that is drawn that matches the route color is another train card that the player must play in order to claim the tunnel route. If you are unable to pay the extra costs, you take the train cards that you tried to use back into your hand and your turn ends.


It doesn't sound like a lot, but these small changes add a lot more strategic depth to the game. The stations add flexibility in case you get blocked by others while the ferries make locomotives more important and the tunnels add a bit of a gambling element - do you try to push ahead early to build the tunnel and possibly not have enough cards, thus wasting your turn, or do you spend an extra turn to get the extra cards you may need but possibly lose the route to another player? This adds enough depth that I think it would fit the Middleweight collection. Would I recommend it over the original Ticket to Ride? Maybe not for new gamers, but I think once you have a few games of the original under your belt you can easily play this one. As such, the game probably is not essential but would be great for the Collector collection.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review #27: Ultimate Werewolf: Deluxe Edition

# of Players:  5-75 Playtime:  30-60 Minutes Core Mechanic:  Deduction Theme:  Werewolf Type:  Party Weight:  Light Year:  2014 Rating: 7.5* This was the first social deduction game that I played and the most memorable social deduction moments may have come from playing this game - and I may never play it again. I'll elaborate on that more in a bit, but it in no way reflects on the quality of the game, which is very, very good. This game opened up the entire genre to me which is now a party staple and most deduction games can probably trace a big part of their game back to Werewolf. I might have played Mafia a couple times with a deck of regular playing cards, which is very similar to Werewolf, but the fact that I'm not certain just shows how much of an impact Werewolf had by comparison. There are two teams in this game - Werewolves and Villagers. The goal for the villagers is to eliminate the werewolves while the goal for...

Review #12: A Few Acres of Snow

# of Players: 2 Playtime:  2-3 Hours Core Mechanic: Deck Building/Area Control Theme:  18th Century North America Type: War Weight:  Heavy Year:  2011 Rating: 8* After discovering how fantastic a two-player game could be with Twilight Struggle, I was in search of something similar.  Around this time, A Few Acres of Snow was released and had just made its way into the Top 50 on BGG.  There was a lot of hype surrounding this release and I gave in, especially as people were calling this Martin Wallace’s take on Dominion, which was a game that I really liked at the time. Set in North America during the 17th and 18th centuries, one player is the British Empire while the other player is France.  The game is played over a map with each player building up a deck of cards consisting of either empire or location cards.  Location cards will be used to settle new villages, upgrade villages, build fortifications, and siege your op...

Review #2: Hive

# of Players: 2 Playtime: 0-30 minutes Core Mechanic: Tile Placement Theme:  Insects Type: Abstract Weight: Light-Medium Year:  2001 Rating: 8* Place a tile or move a tile you've already placed. Protect your queen. Surround your opponent's queen. That's it. Very simple rules but underneath these rules is a very deep and tactical experience. This abstract tile placement game has held off most newcomers and as of this review sits just outside of the Top 10 Abstract Games and Top 200 Games of All-Time on BoardGameGeek over 15 years since it's release. Impressive. This game is themed around a hive of insects protecting its own queen and attacking the enemy's (by surrounding it). As mentioned already, you and your opponent will be alternating turns, either placing a new hex tile into hive or moving an old one, until all six sides of one queen is surrounded either by friend or for and loses the game. With the exception of the first tur...