Skip to main content

Review #26: Dixit

# of Players: 3-6
Playtime: 0-30 Minutes
Core Mechanic: Voting
Theme: Story
Type: Party
Weight: Light
Year: 2008

Rating: 6.5*

When I first started playing board games, this was the party game that everyone was talking about. As I was new to board games, I got swept right into the hype. Amazing artwork combined with seemingly solid mechanics, it definitely appealed to me more than the popularity driven games of Apples to Apples or Cards Against Humanity. However, the biggest problem I saw was myself and that I could not picture myself as a creative or clever person and that could potentially hold back my enjoyment of the game.


Each player has a set of cards with wacky illustrations on them. Each round, one player, the storyteller, will select one of his or her cards secretly and put it face down in the middle of the table and say a word or phrase that has to do with the illustration on the card. The other players will then select a card from their hand that they think the word or phrase could apply to and puts it face down as well. The pile of cards are shuffled and everyone except the storyteller tries to guess which card the storyteller played.


Players get 3 points if they can correctly guess the card that the storyteller played but also get 1 point for each other player that guesses the card he or she played. The storyteller gets 3 points for each correct guess by the other players, but if everyone is able to guess correctly or if no one can, the storyteller does not gain any points for making it too easy or hard and everyone else gets 2 points. Players then replenish their hands and the game continues until the deck is empty.

The key of the game is being able to come up with good clues that some will understand and some will not. I am terrible at this. But I can see some people being great at coming up with clues and like I previously mentioned there is logic to the game and it isn't a popularity contest over which picture fits the phrase best. It is a very light game, perfect for parties, but not perfect for me. I prefer Mysterium over this game, which adds more structure to the game but also at the expense of making the game heavier. But as intended, this makes a great game to add to the Gateway collection. And because of its reputation, even though it may not be my favorite, I think many would consider it a must-have and so I will put it into the Essential and Collector collections as well.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review #27: Ultimate Werewolf: Deluxe Edition

# of Players:  5-75 Playtime:  30-60 Minutes Core Mechanic:  Deduction Theme:  Werewolf Type:  Party Weight:  Light Year:  2014 Rating: 7.5* This was the first social deduction game that I played and the most memorable social deduction moments may have come from playing this game - and I may never play it again. I'll elaborate on that more in a bit, but it in no way reflects on the quality of the game, which is very, very good. This game opened up the entire genre to me which is now a party staple and most deduction games can probably trace a big part of their game back to Werewolf. I might have played Mafia a couple times with a deck of regular playing cards, which is very similar to Werewolf, but the fact that I'm not certain just shows how much of an impact Werewolf had by comparison. There are two teams in this game - Werewolves and Villagers. The goal for the villagers is to eliminate the werewolves while the goal for...

Review #12: A Few Acres of Snow

# of Players: 2 Playtime:  2-3 Hours Core Mechanic: Deck Building/Area Control Theme:  18th Century North America Type: War Weight:  Heavy Year:  2011 Rating: 8* After discovering how fantastic a two-player game could be with Twilight Struggle, I was in search of something similar.  Around this time, A Few Acres of Snow was released and had just made its way into the Top 50 on BGG.  There was a lot of hype surrounding this release and I gave in, especially as people were calling this Martin Wallace’s take on Dominion, which was a game that I really liked at the time. Set in North America during the 17th and 18th centuries, one player is the British Empire while the other player is France.  The game is played over a map with each player building up a deck of cards consisting of either empire or location cards.  Location cards will be used to settle new villages, upgrade villages, build fortifications, and siege your op...

Review #2: Hive

# of Players: 2 Playtime: 0-30 minutes Core Mechanic: Tile Placement Theme:  Insects Type: Abstract Weight: Light-Medium Year:  2001 Rating: 8* Place a tile or move a tile you've already placed. Protect your queen. Surround your opponent's queen. That's it. Very simple rules but underneath these rules is a very deep and tactical experience. This abstract tile placement game has held off most newcomers and as of this review sits just outside of the Top 10 Abstract Games and Top 200 Games of All-Time on BoardGameGeek over 15 years since it's release. Impressive. This game is themed around a hive of insects protecting its own queen and attacking the enemy's (by surrounding it). As mentioned already, you and your opponent will be alternating turns, either placing a new hex tile into hive or moving an old one, until all six sides of one queen is surrounded either by friend or for and loses the game. With the exception of the first tur...